24 Apr The Difference Between Aboveground And Underground Remote Fill Systems For Buildings
Remote fill systems are an essential component of fuel oil storage and delivery for buildings that rely on fuel oil for heating. These systems transport fuel oil from storage tanks to heating systems, boilers, and other fuel-powered equipment. The two most common types of remote fill systems are aboveground and underground systems. While both systems serve the same purpose, there are important differences between them that can impact their installation, maintenance, durability, and cost.
In this article, we will explore the differences between aboveground and underground remote fill systems for buildings. We will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each type of system, as well as important factors to consider when choosing between them. Whether you’re a homeowner, building owner, or maintenance professional, understanding the differences between these systems can help you make an informed decision about which one is the best fit for your building’s needs.
Aboveground Remote Fill Systems
Aboveground remote fill systems are typically installed outside of buildings, and they consist of a storage tank, a pump, and a delivery line. The storage tank can be made of steel or fiberglass, and it is designed to hold a specific amount of fuel oil. The pump is used to transport the fuel oil from the storage tank to the delivery line, which then carries the fuel oil to the heating system or other fuel-powered equipment inside the building.
One of the advantages of aboveground remote fill systems is that they are relatively easy to install and maintain. Because the system is located outside of the building, there is no need for excavation or costly construction work. Additionally, the aboveground storage tank can be inspected and cleaned more easily than an underground tank.
Another advantage of aboveground remote fill systems is that they are less expensive than underground systems. The cost of an aboveground system is typically lower than an underground system because there is less labor and material required for installation.
However, there are also some disadvantages to aboveground remote fill systems. One of the main drawbacks is that they are more visible and can be unsightly, especially if the storage tank is located near a residential or commercial area. Additionally, aboveground remote fill systems are more susceptible to damage from weather conditions, such as high winds and heavy snowfall.
Underground Remote Fill Systems
Underground remote fill systems are typically installed below the ground, and they consist of a storage tank, a pump, and a delivery line. The storage tank is typically made of steel or fiberglass and is designed to hold a specific amount of fuel oil. The pump is used to transport the fuel oil from the storage tank to the delivery line, which then carries the fuel oil to the heating system or other fuel-powered equipment inside the building.
One of the advantages of underground remote fill systems is that they are less visible and do not take up valuable space aboveground. Additionally, underground remote fill systems are more secure than aboveground systems because they are less susceptible to theft and vandalism.
Another advantage of underground remote fill systems is that they are more durable than aboveground systems. Because they are located below the ground, they are protected from weather conditions such as high winds and heavy snowfall. Additionally, underground storage tanks are less likely to be damaged in the event of an earthquake.
However, there are also some disadvantages to underground remote fill systems. One of the main drawbacks is that they are more expensive than aboveground systems. The cost of an underground system is typically higher than an aboveground system because there is more labor and material required for installation.
Additionally, underground remote fill systems are more difficult to inspect and maintain than aboveground systems. Because the storage tank is located underground, it is more difficult to access for inspection and cleaning. Additionally, if a leak or other problem occurs with the storage tank, it can be difficult to detect and repair.
Our Final Thoughts
In conclusion, the decision to install an aboveground or underground remote fill system for a building’s fuel oil storage and delivery needs should be based on a variety of factors, including cost, space availability, regulatory requirements, and maintenance considerations. While aboveground systems offer advantages such as ease of installation and maintenance, underground systems offer better protection against potential environmental hazards and vandalism. Ultimately, the choice between the two types of systems will depend on the unique needs and circumstances of the building in question.
As we’ve discussed throughout this article, remote fill systems play a critical role in the safe and efficient delivery of fuel oil for heating and other fuel-powered equipment. By understanding the differences between aboveground and underground systems, building owners and maintenance professionals can make informed decisions about which type of system to install, ensuring that their building remains comfortable, safe, and efficient year-round.
Contact The Premier Source For Remote Fill Systems
Get ready to fuel up with the innovative San Francisco Remote Fill System from Remote Fill Systems! As the go-to source for remote fill tanks and systems for generator fueling, they are committed to providing top-notch support to their customers every step of the way. Their team of experienced experts has a wealth of knowledge in fuel oil, industrial process control, and mechanical HVAC and piping systems. They have even developed cutting-edge and cost-effective products that cater to the unique needs of their customers.
Take, for instance, their impressive 24 X 24 X 24 flush mount unit! This compact but mighty system has a 2-inch flange on all sides and weighs in at a mere 85 lbs. The enclosure is made of welded steel construction and features a kamvalock fitting and dust cover. Plus, it’s versatile enough to allow piping to enter from the top, bottom, back, or sides.
The San Francisco Remote Fill System also ships with a matching remote fill control panel, complete with UL Listing UL 508. The system’s secondary containment boasts an impressive 5.3 gallons, requiring only 120 volts on a dedicated circuit at the control panel. The matching control panel powers even the remote fill enclosure light and horn.
So, what are you waiting for? Say goodbye to traditional fueling methods and hello to the convenience and efficiency of the San Francisco Remote Fill System from Remote Fill Systems!
No Comments